Plans to redevelop former Bristol Zoo Gardens site delayed by legal challenge
Plans to build almost 200 new homes on the site of the former Bristol Zoo Gardens have been delayed by a legal challenge brought by campaigners against the development.
The Save Bristol Gardens Alliance has described the move as a "giant step" forward in their efforts to block the development from being built in its current design.
Members of Bristol Zoological Society, who own the site, are frustrated that the challenge will delay them from being able to sell the site, with the organisation hoping to use the money to expand the Bristol Zoo Project in South Gloucestershire.
Background to the zoo plans
Bristol Zoo Gardens shut in September 2022 after 186 years and the majority of the animals have now been transferred to a new site formerly known as the Wild Place Project.
Since then, plans have been unveiled to sell off the original site in Clifton and build 196 homes, a new public park, a cafe, a playground and a conservation hub in its place.
In September, Campaigners from the alliance against these proposals raised money to begin legal proceedings against Bristol City Council, which has granted planning permission for the developments.
Now, a High Court judge has agreed that each of the three different grounds of objection to the planning permission is "arguable", meaning the case can be taken to a judicial review. It is expected to be held next year.
The alliance, made up of local residents, environmentalists and campaigners wanting to keep some kind of zoo-based visitor attraction at the site in Clifton, said it was "brilliant news".
A spokesperson for them said: “This is brilliant news, and a giant step towards overturning the flawed planning permission for a luxury housing development on this site.
“We say that council planners were wrong in allowing the Zoo to miscalculate the impact on biodiversity and carbon emissions and wrong under planning law in allowing development on this important open space,” she added.
“We are delighted that the judge has agreed that we have an arguable case. When first proposed, this scheme caused a huge public outcry across Bristol and the strength of opposition has not gone away. It is clearly the wrong development in the wrong place.
“No amount of greenwashing and spin from Bristol Zoological Society can hide the fact that the proposed development will destroy biodiversity, massively increase embodied carbon in the city and that cutting down 162 trees is simply wrong. The environmental impact is unjustifiable,” she claimed.
“Everyone in Bristol can help preserve a historic, nature rich oasis that has been enjoyed by Bristolians for nearly two centuries,” she added.
The Alliance aims to overturn the planning permission and replace these with proposals for a "nature-led alternative for the site", which would ensure the Zoo Gardens would "remain accessible for all Bristolians in perpetuity".
Bristol Zoological Society 'disappointed' by judicial review
The ruling has disappointed Bristol Zoological Society, which hoped the judge would reject all three grounds for objections.
A spokesperson said: “We understand our planning application for the redevelopment of the former Bristol Zoo Gardens site, which Bristol City Council’s Development Control Committee resolved to grant planning consent for in April 2023, is to be challenged at a Judicial Review.
“This decision is delaying a development that will bring much-needed housing to Bristol.
"Our plan includes 196 new homes (20 percent affordable) a new public park which would see the gardens accessible for free, for the first time, a new café, playground and conservation hub.
“While this delay is disappointing, we remain confident in our plans and genuinely believe this is the right thing for Bristol. As a conservation and education charity, we are committed to saving wildlife.
"We will continue to progress with the sale of the site which will support the creation of a new conservation zoo at our Bristol Zoo Project site, where at least 80% of species will be both threatened, and part of targeted conservation programmes.
“We will liaise with Bristol City Council before deciding on our next steps."
The judicial review will most likely be heard at the start of 2025.