Croydon primary school fined £35,000 after boy left with life-changing burns in nativity fire

St Thomas Becket Catholic Primary School was found guilty of health and safety failings by a jury at Southwark Crown Court. Credit: St Thomas Becket Catholic Primary School

A Croydon primary school has been fined £35,000 after a boy was left with life-changing burns when his nativity costume caught fire during a Christmas carol concert in 2019.

St Thomas Becket Catholic Primary School was found guilty of health and safety failings by a jury at Southwark Crown Court this month.

He was estimated to have sustained burns on 45% of his body that have left him dependent on third party care for basic needs.

The boy, then aged seven, has been in a line of pupils each holding a lit candle in Our Lady of the Annunciation Church, when his homemade sheep costume caught fire, the court heard.

The fire was extinguished “with some difficulty” and the child received first aid at the scene before he was taken by air ambulance to hospital.

The child’s parents described the “excruciating” pain their son, who no longer attends the school, has been through and is still going through.

In victim statements read out in court, the child's mother said she “thought the worst” when the boy was in hospital and his father saying he is “lucky to be alive”.

The court heard they were waiting for their son to emerge in the church when people started running outside and screaming, which the father described as feeling like “a bomb had gone off”.

Our Lady of the Annunciation Church on Bingham Road where a young boy suffered serious burns during a school Christmas carol event. Credit: PA

The mother said her son’s best friend said he was on fire, prompting her to “force” her way back into the church.

Both parents found their son standing “screaming” in a bucket of water in the church, the court heard.

His father said the image has been “tattooed” in his mind.

The court heard how the young boy underwent “countless” surgeries and hospital appointments, which are continuing three years later.

“I protect my son from every look from a stranger when we are out together,” the father said. “I walk in front of him to protect him from the glares of others. I think of him growing older in such a cruel world.

“It overwhelms me to think that my son will never know what a normal life is.”

The mother said a school should be a “trusted place” for parents and children and would never expect her child’s school to “expose him to life-threatening danger like this”.

“I haven’t stepped in a church since and I don’t think I ever will,” she said.

Judge Philip Bartle fined the state school £35,000 for breaching the Health and Safety at Work etc Act 1974 – more specifically for failing to properly assess the risk involved and failing to take reasonably practical steps to minimise or eliminate the risk.

The judge also ordered that the school should pay £25,970 in prosecution costs and that victim compensation should be dealt with by the civil courts.

Judge Bartle said of the boy’s parents: “Their love for (their son) and their dedication to his welfare shine out from all they say.

“I acknowledge the selfless devoted care that they have given to him.”

In defence of the school, the court heard that the board of governors apologises to the family, that the school has a good health and safety record and that it has banned the use of candles.


Want a quick and expert briefing on the biggest news stories? Listen to our latest podcasts to find out What You Need To Know...


Following the incident the London Fire Brigade issued a warning against the “completely unnecessary hazard” of candles when it comes to children and school plays, and said LED or electric candles should be used.

Health and Safety Executive inspector Sarah Whittle said: “This was a shocking and scary incident that could have so easily been avoided.

“Common sense alone should have been enough to see the risk.

“Mitigation in this case would have been the substitution of wax candles for flameless ones, thereby reducing the risk to zero.

“This was a step the school took after the incident, but by then it was far too late for a young child who will be forever affected by this.

“The importance of a suitable and sufficient risk assessment has never been made so clear.”