COP28: 'UAE consensus' climate text criticised as a 'catastrophe' and 'flawed'

ITV News Health and Science Correspondent Martin Stew reports from Dubai on the newly announced COP28 'UAE consensus'


Climate groups and a UK-based charity have labelled the final agreement from the COP28 United Nations (UN) Climate Summit a "catastrophe" and "severely flawed".

The paper, which was proposed on Wednesday after the Dubai summit was scheduled to finish, calls for the world to wean itself off planet-warming fossil fuels, but it stops short of calling for them to be phased out.

Instead, the text - which COP28 President Sultan al-Jaber coined the "UAE consensus" - calls for "transitioning away from fossil fuels in energy systems, in a just, orderly and equitable manner, accelerating action in this critical decade".

The word "oil" does not feature in the 21-page document, which mentions "fossil fuels" twice.

The COP28 climate conference took place in Dubai. Credit: AP

Zahra Hdidou, senior climate and resilience adviser for ActionAid UK which works with some of the world's poorest women, said the text represents "a catastrophe for many climate-stricken communities in the Global South and a shocking abdication of duty from major polluters".

She said: "While there was encouraging language on 'transitioning away' from fossil fuels, this is undermined by vague timelines and empty promises.

"If Antonio Guterres [UN Secretary-General] said we're on the highway to hell, then wealthy countries like the UK are about to press their foot on the accelerator. But we won't go quietly."

Ms Hdidou said hopes that the talks would lead to ground-breaking commitments to phase out fossil fuels had not been fulfilled.

"Even after hearing of the 'death sentence' facing climate-affected countries, major polluters remain tin-eared - all because they remain unwilling to budge an inch to fund a fossil fuel phaseout," she said.


Climate minister says it was 'certainly' worth 6,800 mile round trip to attend end of COP28 after leaving early


Jean Su, energy justice director at the Centre for Biological Diversity, said forcing countries to deal with fossil fuels was a "general win", but the details were "severely flawed".

She said: "The problem with the text is that it still includes cavernous loopholes that allow the United States and other fossil fuel producing countries to keep going on their expansion of fossil fuels.

"There's a pretty deadly, fatal flaw in the text, which allows for transitional fuels to continue which is a code word for natural gas that also emits carbon pollution."

Meanwhile, a spokesperson for the World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF) said that while the deal falls "short of consensus on the full phase-out of coal, oil and gas", the decision to "transition away from fossil fuels is a significant moment".

World Resources Institute global climate programme director Melanie Robinson also praised the plan, saying it would "dramatically move the needle in the fight against climate change and overcome immense pressure from oil and gas interests".


Want a quick and expert briefing on the biggest news stories? Listen to our latest podcasts to find out What You Need To Know...