Judge dismisses $5m lawsuit claiming Ana de Armas fans tricked into watching Yesterday film

Ana de Armas did not star in Danny Boyle's Beatles-themed film Yesterday. Credit: AP

A judge has thrown out a $5 million (£3.9 million) US lawsuit brought by fans of Ana de Armas, alleging that they were tricked into watching a film because she briefly appeared in the trailer.

Conor Woulfe and Peter Michael Rosza accused Universal Pictures of false advertising and said they were "deceived" twice, after de Armas appeared in a trailer for Danny Boyle's Beatles-themed film Yesterday, but not the full feature.

Starring Himesh Patel and Lily James, Yesterday follows failed musician Jack, who hits his head during a black-out, and wakes up to a world that does not know The Beatles.

Taking this opportunity, Jack adopts The Beatles’ songs as his own, becoming famous.

A 2019 trailer for the film shows a brief clip in which Jack appears on an episode of James Corden’s The Late Late Show, alongside de Armas – though the actress does not speak.

Mr Woulfe and Mr Rosza said they would not have rented the movie had they known that de Armas would not appear in the actual movie.

In a later amended complaint, the lawsuit stated that Mr Woulfe also paid to watch Yesterday on Google Play, as Google search results had listed de Armas as a cast member.

"Based upon this information, plaintiff Woulfe believed that de Armas would be in the movie and paid again to watch Yesterday," court documents said.

"De Armas was not featured in the movie. Thus, plaintiff claims to have been deceived again."

Castmembers Ed Sheeran, Lily James, and Himesh Patel at the UK premiere of Yesterday. Credit: AP

In his order, filed on Monday, judge Stephen Wilson noted that the men had amended their complaint three times since first bringing the lawsuit in 2022.

"In each prior dismissal, the court has clearly delineated the pitfalls of the complaint and allowed successive amendments," he wrote.

"However, it now appears to the court that further amendments would be a futility.

"Accordingly, dismissal is without leave to amend.

"This is the third time that plaintiff has amended their complaint, and it shall be the last."


Tune into the ITV News entertainment podcast, Unscripted...