Boris Johnson’s defence passed to MPs preparing to question him over partygate ‘lies’
The committee confirmed it received the evidence, key to Mr Johnson’s political future, on Monday, ITV News' Political Correspondent Libby Wiener reports
Boris Johnson faces a wait for the publication of his defence to claims he lied to Parliament with his partygate denials after handing over a dossier in the run-up to a televised grilling.
Sources close to the former Prime Minister urged the Privileges Committee to make the evidence public “as soon as possible” ahead of his televised questioning on Wednesday.
Mr Johnson’s written evidence is key to his political future because a finding that he "recklessly" misled MPs, and therefore committed a contempt of Parliament, could lead to his suspension and a possible by-election.
The committee confirmed it received the evidence, key to Mr Johnson’s political future, at 2.32pm on Monday.
A spokesman for the panel of MPs said: “The committee will need to review what has been submitted in the interests of making appropriate redactions to protect the identity of some witnesses.
“The committee intends to publish this as soon as is practicably possible. The material will be published on the committee website.”
The cross-party committee said it will publish Mr Johnson's defence as soon as possible but will first need to analyse it for any issues, such as names of witnesses that may need to be redacted.
However, it is highly unlikely to be published on Monday, as clerks and lawyers are still combing through the lengthy document.
An ally of Mr Johnson said: “Boris’s formal submission has been made to the committee today, as planned.
“The committee control the timing of publication. We encourage them to publish it as soon as possible.”
The Partygate: The Inside Story podcast brings you fresh revelations and our whistleblowers in their own words in the definitive behind-closed-doors story of how ITV News uncovered one of the biggest scandals of our era.
The defence was expected to take the form of a lengthy submission from Mr Johnson’s barrister Lord Pannick KC.
Meanwhile, Downing Street has warned the former PM's supporters against interfering in the inquiry.
Rishi Sunak’s official spokesman defended the Privileges Committee investigation as friends of the former PM sought to portray it as a “witch hunt”.
Conor Burns, a Tory MP who served as a minister in Mr Johnson’s government, has accused committee chair and Labour grandee Harriet Harman of "predetermining" the inquiry.
He raised a tweet posted by Ms Harman in April 2022, where she wrote that if (Boris Johnson and Rishi Sunak) admit guilt, by which she said was accepting a fixed penalty notice, then they are also admitting that they misled the House of Commons.
Tory peer Lord Greenhalgh backed a campaign for the four Conservative MPs on the Tory-majority committee to pull out of the “kangaroo court”.
The Prime Minister’s official spokesman responded by saying Mr Sunak “firmly believes it’s a matter for Parliament”, adding: “Parliament empowered the committee to carry out its work.”
He endorsed Commons Leader Penny Mordaunt’s warning that “a very dim view will be taken” of anyone who “tries to prevent them from carrying out this serious work”.
She also said the committee must be able to “work without fear or favour”.
Mr Sunak’s spokesman added: “We think this is a committee that’s carrying out a function asked to by Parliament, it’s a parliamentary matter, and the Leader of the House set out how we would want parliamentarians to engage with it.”
Downing Street was also forced to deny it had delayed key announcements because of the distraction that will be caused by Mr Johnson’s inquiry appearance.
“It’s wrong to suggest government business changed as a result of this committee hearing,” the spokesman said.
The hearing clashes with a key vote on Mr Sunak’s new Brexit deal for Northern Ireland, which Democratic Unionist Party MPs plan to oppose.
An estimated £220,000 of taxpayers’ money has been allocated for Mr Johnson’s legal bills.
ITV News' Political Editor Robert Peston explains what this could mean for Boris Johnson
If the committee rules that he did mislead the House, they will consider whether it was “reckless or intentional” and amounted to a contempt of Parliament.
An interim report by the committee earlier this month said evidence strongly suggested breaches of coronavirus rules would have been “obvious” to the then-prime minister.
But Mr Johnson claimed it was “clear” that he had not committed a contempt of Parliament, arguing there is “no evidence in the report that I knowingly or recklessly misled Parliament” or failed to update it in a timely manner.
Mr Johnson has also sought to cast doubt on the findings of Sue Gray’s report on partygate, after she quit the civil service to take up a role in Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer’s office.
The Privileges Committee is examining evidence around at least four occasions when Mr Johnson may have misled MPs with his assurances to the Commons that lockdown rules were followed.
He is expected to highlight previously undisclosed WhatsApp messages from senior civil servants and members of his No 10 team showing he had relied on their advice when he made his statements to Parliament.
He will also publish messages which show other senior figures in Downing Street believed the gatherings were covered by the “workplace exemption” in the lockdown rules.
The committee will publish its findings on whether Mr Johnson committed a contempt of Parliament and make a recommendation on any punishment but the ultimate decision will fall to the full House of Commons.
Mr Sunak has said he will not seek to influence MPs on the committee and is expected to grant a free vote in the Commons on any sanction that may be recommended.
A suspension of 10 sitting days or more for Mr Johnson could ultimately trigger a by-election in his Uxbridge and South Ruislip seat, which he held with a majority of 7,210 in 2019.
Want a quick and expert briefing on the biggest news stories? Listen to our latest podcasts to find out What You Need To Know