Revealed: The five suncreams costing up to £28 that 'do not offer protection claimed'

Some sunscreens are not offering the level of protection claimed. Credit: PA

Expensive mineral-based suncreams have failed to provide the level of protection claimed on their packaging, according to consumer group Which?

None of the five mineral SPF30 products included in the testing offered the level of protection claimed, the watchdog said.

Three of the products failed tests for both SPF (sun protection factor), measuring a sunscreen’s ability to filter UVB (ultraviolet) rays, and UVA, which can also increase the risk of skin cancer and lead to darkening and ageing of the skin.

Source: Which?

The five products failing the test:

  • One of the least effective, Clinique Mineral Sunscreen Lotion, which costs £26 for a 125 ml bottle, barely provided a third of the claimed SPF level in tests, according to the testing.

  • Tropic Skin Shade Cream, costing £28 for 200ml, co-owned by Lord Sugar and former Apprentice contestant Susan Ma, barely provided a third of its claimed SPF30 and also failed tests for UVA. However, Which? said it was the only brand that had committed to a full re-testing of its product and had ceased sales of it while they waited for the results.

  • Alba Botanica Sensitive Mineral Fragrance Free, £11.99 for 113ml, which is sold on the high street at Holland and Barrett, also failed both SPF and UVA testing.

  • Hawaiian Tropic Mineral Protective Sun Milk (£10.50/100ml) passed the Which? UVA testing but also offered significantly less SPF protection than claimed, meaning it failed the tests.

  • The fifth mineral sunscreen, Green People Scent Free Sun Cream SPF30 at £25.50 for 200ml, which also uses chemical UV filters, passed on SPF protection but failed when it came to blocking UVA rays.

Most high street sunscreens, known as chemical-based sunscreens, work because they use ingredients that absorb UV rays, whereas mineral sunscreens physically block ultraviolet radiation using ingredients such as titanium dioxide or zinc oxide.

Which? said products needed to pass both SPF and UVA tests to be considered acceptable, so it had labelled all five mineral products that failed its testing as "don’t buys".

Eight chemical-based sunscreens including cheap supermarket own brands passed both the SPF and the UVA testing. However, the testing panel found various differences between products when it came to factors such as ease of application, absorbance and greasiness.

Mum warns of danger of suncreams after sons burn despite wearing factor 50
WhatsApp users warned over Father’s Day Heineken beer scam
Source: Which?

Eight sunscreens that passed tests:

  • Asda Protect Moisturising Sun Lotion SPF30, £2.80/200ml

  • Avon Sun Body Cream SPF30, £5/150ml

  • Calypso Press & Protect Sun Lotion SPF30, £3.49/200ml

  • Lloyds Pharmacy Solero Moisturising Sun Lotion SPF30, £7/200ml

  • Morrisons Sun Protect & Nourish Sun Spray SPF30, £3.50/200ml

  • Piz Buin Allergy Sun Sensitive Skin Lotion SPF30, £8/200ml

  • Superdrug Solait Moisturising Sun Spray SPF30 High, £5.49/200ml

  • Ultrasun Family SPF30, £26/150ml

What have the brands had to say about this?

Hawaiian Tropic and Clinique rejected the Which? findings. Green People said it was investigating further and Alba Botanica did not respond to requests for comment.

Tropic Skin has stopped selling the product in question and committed to a full re-testing.

Is a heatwave on the way? Why the weather is heating up this week

Edgewell, which makes Hawaiian Tropic, said: “We are proud of the quality and performance of our products and we stand behind their labelling.

“In the specific case of our product Hawaiian Tropic Mineral Protective Sun Lotion Skin Nourishing Milk SPF 30, we firmly disagree with the testing results obtained by Which? Our product was tested using the ISO 24444 method and obtained a SPF result of 34.5.

“In addition, our product obtained results for UVA protection levels that surpass the minimum thresholds required by European regulations currently recognised by the United Kingdom.”

Green People said: “We strive to offer our customers the most effective sun protection products that they can trust to care for their skin and, in response to Which?’s findings, we have voluntarily submitted all Green People sun care products for further testing by an independent laboratory.

“The results of this have revealed that all Green People SPF15 creams (face and body formulations) and Green People Scent Free Facial Sun Cream SPF30 offers the claimed level of UVB protection and the recommended level of UVA protection.

“Investigations into the UVA performance of Green People Scent Free Sun Cream SPF30 for body continue.”

Want a quick and expert briefing on the biggest news stories? Listen to our latest podcasts to find out What You Need To Know

'A massive concern'

Natalie Hitchins, Which? head of home products and services, said: “Looking after your skin while enjoying the sunshine is something everyone should do to prevent skin damage and the risk of skin cancer.

"It’s a massive concern that none of the expensive mineral sunscreens in our tests offered the level of protection claimed on their packaging.

“Our advice is don’t waste your money or take any unnecessary risks – stick to a tried and tested and reliable suncream.

"We’ve found plenty of highly effective, cheap sunscreens available on the high street so there’s no need to splash out to keep you and your loved ones safe in the sun.”